<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Avila-García, Orlando</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lola Cañamero</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">René te Boekhorst</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Banzhaf, Wolfgang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Christaller, Thomas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dittrich, Peter</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kim, Jan T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ziegler, Jens</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Analyzing the Performance of &quot;Winner-Take-All&quot; and &quot;Voting-Based&quot; Action Selection Policies within the Two-Resource Problem</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Advances in Artificial Life: 7th European Conference, ECAL 2003</style></secondary-title><tertiary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence</style></tertiary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2003</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2003</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-39432-7_79</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Springer</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dortmund, Germany</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2801</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">733–742</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">978-3-540-20057-4</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The problem of action selection for an autonomous creature implies resolving conflicts between competing behavioral alternatives. These conflicts can be resolved either via competition, following a “winner-take-all” approach, or via cooperation in a “voting-based” approach. In this paper we present two robotic architectures implementing these approaches, and report on experiments we have performed to compare their underlying optimization policies. We have framed this study within the context of the “two-resource problem,” as it provides a widely used standard that favors systematic experimentation, analysis, and comparison of results.</style></abstract><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;a href=&quot;https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-39432-7_79&quot;&gt;Download&lt;/a&gt;</style></notes></record></records></xml>